Document
Tech Spec
**Verifiable Semantic Execution Layer (VSEL)**
Verifiable Semantic Execution Layer (VSEL)
1. Purpose
This document defines the technical specification for implementing VSEL.
It translates:
- formal semantics
- invariants
- mapping rules
- trace requirements
- constraint derivation
- proof and verification logic
into enforceable engineering requirements.
The objective is:
Eliminate interpretation. Every component must behave exactly as specified or fail.
2. System Architecture Overview
VSEL is composed of the following modules:
- Formal Specification Engine (FSE)
- Semantic Intermediate Representation (SIR)
- Execution Engine (EE)
- Trace Engine (TE)
- Constraint Engine (CE)
- Prover (PR)
- Verifier (VR)
- Composition Layer (CL)
Each module must be:
- deterministic
- isolated
- auditable
3. Core Data Structures
3.1 State Object
State {
canonical: CanonicalState,
derived: DerivedState,
environment: Environment,
metadata: Metadata
}
Constraints:
- canonical must be minimal and sufficient
- derived must be recomputable
- environment must be explicit
- metadata must not leak semantics
3.2 Canonical State
CanonicalState {
accounts: Map<AccountID, AccountData>,
storage: Map<Key, Value>,
system_data: SystemData
}
Rules:
- no redundant representation
- no hidden fields
- deterministic encoding required
3.3 Derived State
DerivedState {
state_root: Hash,
auxiliary_roots: Map<String, Hash>,
aggregates: Map<String, Value>
}
Constraint:
DerivedState == Derive(CanonicalState)
3.4 Input Object
Input {
payload: Payload,
auth: Authorization,
aux: AuxiliaryData
}
Rules:
- payload defines semantics
- auth defines permission
- aux must not influence semantics
3.5 Trace Entry
TraceEntry {
index: UInt64,
pre_state_root: Hash,
post_state_root: Hash,
input: Input,
observable: Observable,
metadata: EntryMetadata
}
4. Execution Engine (EE)
4.1 Interface
Execute(state: State, input: Input) -> State
4.2 Execution Pipeline
Strict order:
- canonicalize input
- validate authorization
- validate preconditions
- apply transition
- validate postconditions
- recompute derived state
- update metadata
Deviation = failure.
4.3 Determinism Requirement
Execute(s, i) == Execute(s, i)
Always.
No exceptions.
4.4 Forbidden Behavior
- implicit state mutation
- hidden randomness
- partial updates
- silent failure
5. Trace Engine (TE)
5.1 Interface
RecordTransition(pre: State, input: Input, post: State) -> TraceEntry
5.2 Requirements
- every transition recorded
- ordering strictly enforced
- hash chaining required
5.3 Trace Commitment
trace_root = Hash(entry_0 || entry_1 || ... || entry_n)
5.4 Replay Guarantee
Replay(trace) == original_trace
6. Semantic Mapping Enforcement
6.1 Mapping Interface
MapState(concrete_state) -> formal_state
MapInput(concrete_input) -> formal_input
6.2 Mapping Constraints
- must be total
- must be deterministic
- must be canonical
6.3 Enforcement Condition
MapState(Execute(s, i)) == ApplyFormal(MapState(s), MapInput(i))
Failure = semantic violation.
7. Constraint Engine (CE)
7.1 Interface
GenerateConstraints(trace: Trace) -> ConstraintSystem
7.2 Requirements
- constraints derived from SIR
- no manual constraint injection
- full coverage of transitions
7.3 Constraint Completeness
ValidTrace(trace) <=> SatisfiesConstraints(trace)
7.4 Forbidden
- unconstrained variables
- unused witness inputs
- partial constraint encoding
8. Prover (PR)
8.1 Interface
Prove(trace: Trace, constraints: ConstraintSystem) -> Proof
8.2 Requirements
- proof binds to full trace
- witness uniquely determined
- domain separation enforced
8.3 Output
Proof {
commitments,
proof_data,
public_inputs,
metadata
}
9. Verifier (VR)
9.1 Interface
Verify(proof: Proof) -> bool
9.2 Requirements
Verification must enforce:
- domain correctness
- proof validity
- state commitment integrity
- semantic binding
9.3 Acceptance Condition
Verify(proof) == true => ValidTrace(trace)
10. Invariant Enforcement
10.1 Implementation
Each invariant must be:
- encoded in execution checks
- encoded in constraints
- enforced in verification
10.2 Failure
Any invariant violation must:
- halt execution OR
- produce explicit error state
11. Composition Layer (CL)
11.1 Interface
Compose(systemA, systemB) -> composed_system
11.2 Requirements
- shared state consistency
- cross-invariant enforcement
- synchronized transitions
11.3 Failure Modes
- state divergence
- invariant violation
- ordering mismatch
12. Cryptographic Requirements
- all hashes must be domain-separated
- commitments must be collision-resistant
- signatures must be verifiable under PQC model
13. Versioning
Each component must include:
version_id
constraint_version
proof_version
Mismatch = rejection.
14. Logging vs Trace
Logs are optional. Trace is mandatory.
If something is not in the trace, it does not exist.
15. Testing Requirements
Mandatory:
- differential tests (impl vs spec)
- invariant fuzzing
- constraint fuzzing
- trace mutation testing
- replay validation
16. Failure Handling
All failures must be:
- explicit
- deterministic
- traceable
No silent degradation.
17. Performance Constraints
Optimizations must not:
- remove constraints
- weaken invariants
- introduce nondeterminism
If performance conflicts with correctness, performance loses.
18. Minimal System Guarantee
The system is correct if:
Verify(Prove(trace)) == true => ValidTrace(trace)
If this is not strictly true, the system is invalid.
19. Non-Negotiable Constraints
- no implicit behavior
- no hidden state
- no partial validation
- no ambiguous encoding
- no trust in derived values
20. Closing Statement
This specification is intentionally unforgiving.
It is designed so that:
incorrect implementations fail early instead of succeeding incorrectly.